Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89

Not sure if I will make it, I'm afraid...

Likely to be brief and not very elaborated as sent from my mobile

> On 01 Mar 2014, at 22:09, "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> The tentative time for a side meeting discussion would be Wednesday evening, 8pm. We can meet at the registration desk and then find a place.
>
> BR,
> -Haibin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NFVCON [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carl Moberg
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:35 PM
> To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
> Cc: Thomas Nadeau; nfvcon@ietf.org; Melinda Shore; ext Andy Bierman; Songhaibin (A); ext Diego R. Lopez
> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
>
>
> That would be "seeing", of course.
>
>> On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Carl Moberg <calle@tail-f.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Not exactly sure if by "you should come to IETF again" mean the next
>> meeting in London? Otherwise I'm always interested in swing what
>> you're doing, Mehmet :-)
>>
>>> On Feb 24, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Carl,
>>>
>>> you should come to IETF again. Then you will see what we are doing ;-).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mehmet
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ext Carl Moberg [mailto:calle@tail-f.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 5:29 PM
>>>> To: Thomas Nadeau
>>>> Cc: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich); Songhaibin (A); ext Diego R.
>>>> Lopez; nfvcon@ietf.org; Melinda Shore; ext Andy Bierman
>>>> Subject: Re: [NFVCON] a side meeting @ IETF 89
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 24, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 23, 2014:10:05 AM, at 10:05 AM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN -
>>>>> DE/Munich) <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Diego, All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NETCONF is well-prepared for addressing function configuration on
>>>> diverse reference points of the NFV architecture.
>>>>>> The new interface descriptions in ETSI NFV use a producer/consumer
>>>> paradigm and the interface can be re-exposed practically by any entity.
>>>>>> RESTCONF would be perfect in such an environment as it can support
>>>> HTML-based REST-like configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Take a look at opendaylight.org. We already have a working
>>>> implementation of a RestConf interface working on the controller as
>>>> part of the first release (hydrogen) that talks to a variety of
>>>> routers and switches (real and virtual).
>>>>>
>>>>>    --Tom
>>>>
>>>> That's strange. I didn't even know we had a WG draft for RESTCONF yet?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Carl Moberg
>>>> VP Technology
>>>> twitter: @cmoberg
>>>> http://www.tail-f.com/
>>
>> --
>> Carl Moberg
>> VP Technology
>> twitter: @cmoberg
>> http://www.tail-f.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NFVCON mailing list
>> NFVCON@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
>
> --
> Carl Moberg
> VP Technology
> twitter: @cmoberg
> http://www.tail-f.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> NFVCON mailing list
> NFVCON@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
>
> _______________________________________________
> NFVCON mailing list
> NFVCON@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon

________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx