Re: [Nfvrg] Planning for the coming NFVRG meetings

["Diego R. Lopez" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Laurent,

Thanks for your comments! Let’s see if them, and my reply, make others express their opinions on the list and help the community to shape the new NFVRG stage…

On 3 May 2017, at 09:26 , Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Dear NFVRG, Diego,

Looks like a good proposal, and since you asked (requested) for feedback, here is mine:

-I support setting priority on more discussion / interaction time during f2f meetings. Making a prior check with the presenters/proponents of the topics that issues are well identified and highlighted is important to make sure can happen on these issues during the meeting.

I cannot agree more!

-Re management frameworks, if the RG / chairs find it relevant and useful, we could also work together with the NMRG. As an example, I had some good discussions following the first NFRG meeting in IETF98 on two items that were presented and have links to management aspects (distributed NFV and verification). Identifying management issues/items that are common to NFV and NM could bring an additional reading/understanding.

I hope the interest in management frameworks is confirmed, and definitely will welcome any kind of common approach to NFV management issues.

-Question: you wrote " focusing each meeting (or series of meetings) on a particular issue ", do you consider the 4 topics/domains listed in your email (or other / different granularity topics)?
 The point is that if one topic per meeting, and one if NFVRG meeting per IETF, then a topic will be discussed "live" only once a year... not sure this is the expected effect.
 I understand discussion should also happen on the mailing list, but this is a general question I have about the new meeting scheme (also since we face similar issue in the NMRG).

What I had in mind was not necessarily a round-robin approach, nor a pattern of discussion only at the IETF meetings (or on the list). If we agree on these few items (or a similar number) and we can assign a priority to them, higher-priority items will get more dedicated sessions, at the IETF or elsewhere, by means of interim meetings that we are considering to have at specific venues related with a particular issue.

Be goode,

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: [e-mail]
Tel:    [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
----------------------------------


________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição