RE: [NGO] BOF Proposal: Comparing Approaches to NETCONF Modeling(CANMOD)

Absolutely. No slides, no delay tactics!
CONCRETE and pretty COMPLETE base proposals.
With an evaluation on how the meet the DT requirements
or for those they think are not important a justification 
why they think they are not important.
And if a concrete proposal thinks they meet other
requirements, then they better justify/explain such extra
requirements.

Just my view, but we MUST (I think) converge/agree/decide
on what to do and on a direction that a WG needs to go.

Bert Wijnen 

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Balazs Lengyel [mailto:balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com]
> Verzonden: maandag 28 januari 2008 16:50
> Aan: Ladislav Lhotka
> CC: ngo@ietf.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [NGO] BOF Proposal: Comparing Approaches to NETCONF
> Modeling(CANMOD)
> 
> 
> Hello Lada,
> Sorry, but I think we need to move beyond the slideware phase 
> otherwise we will have delivery 
> dates in the  next millennium.
> Balazs
> 
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Hi David,
> > 
> > David Partain píše v Po 28. 01. 2008 v 16:20 +0100:
> >>   4. "something relaxng-ish": how it meets the agreed
> >>      requirements, which additional requirements it meets and
> >>      chooses not to.  (Presenter not yet known: 25 minutes) Clarifying
> >>      questions only.
> > 
> > I'd volunteer to prepare this presentation, or cooperate on it. But - is
> > it necessary to have a corresponding draft out before IETF 71?
> > 
> > Lada
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
> TSP System Manager
> ECN: 831 7320                        Fax: +36 1 4377792
> Tel: +36-1-437-7320     email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NGO mailing list
> NGO@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo
> 

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo