Re: [NGO] NETCONF Data Modeling BoF (NDM) proposal

Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> Fri, 07 September 2007 15:20 UTC

Return-path: <ngo-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITfd7-0005O5-Dx; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:20:21 -0400
Received: from ngo by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ITfd6-0005Nu-Hm for ngo-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:20:20 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITfd6-0005Nl-7f for ngo@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:20:20 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITfd5-0007oF-OO for ngo@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:20:20 -0400
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 4447320FDB; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:20:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b2038bb0000007e1-42-46e16c323554
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.122]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 26C8D205AE; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:20:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.175]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:20:18 +0200
Received: from [159.107.196.23] ([159.107.196.23]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:20:17 +0200
Message-ID: <46E16C31.6020202@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:20:17 +0200
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
Subject: Re: [NGO] NETCONF Data Modeling BoF (NDM) proposal
References: <46E03BD1.4010702@andybierman.com> <20070906184430.GA2882@elstar.local> <46E05160.50503@andybierman.com> <20070906195555.GA3040@elstar.local> <46E0630B.2030908@andybierman.com> <20070906211658.GA3081@elstar.local> <46E07909.1060209@andybierman.com> <20070907063232.GA3394@elstar.local> <46E15034.30309@andybierman.com>
In-Reply-To: <46E15034.30309@andybierman.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2007 15:20:17.0944 (UTC) FILETIME=[99015980:01C7F162]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: NETCONF Goes On <ngo@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ngo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-Post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ngo-bounces@ietf.org

Hello Andy,
You yourself sad that XSD is
- write-only
- prone to errors
- you yourself choose not to use it
- is like programming in assembler

(Which I fully agree with.)

I am surprised that you still want it as the main modeling language for Netconf.

The fact that IETF could not agree on SMIng should not just mean that we avoid modeling in the 
future, but also that we accept, that there is a stronger need for compromise.

As I see it, a  good part of SMIng's problem were due to compatibility constraints with SNMP, 
which is less of a problem for a Netconf modeling language.

Balazs



_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo