Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire
Monica Cucoanes <MONICA@cepes.ro> Thu, 03 February 1994 18:20 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12364; 3 Feb 94 13:20 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12358; 3 Feb 94 13:20 EST
Received: from nic.near.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14414; 3 Feb 94 13:20 EST
Received: from nic.near.net by nic.near.net id aa08242; 3 Feb 94 13:12 EST
Received: from ROEARN.ICI.AC.RO by nic.near.net id aa08144; 3 Feb 94 13:09 EST
Received: from CEPES.RO (MONICA) by ROEARN (MX V3.1C) with BSMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 1994 14:51:27 +0200
Received: from CEPES.RO by CEPES.RO (PMDF #12540) id <01H8G9R6R64G0001SR@CEPES.RO>; Thu, 3 Feb 1994 14:12 MET
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 1994 14:12:00 -0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Monica Cucoanes <MONICA@cepes.ro>
Subject: Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire
To: us-wg@nic.near.net, PACS-L@uhupvm1.uh.edu, uri@bunyip.com, iafa@bunyip.com, iiir@merit.edu, www-talk@www0.cern.ch, wais-talk@quake.think.com, srs@merit.edu, nir@mailbase.ac.uk, ietf-wnils@ucdavis.edu, bajan@bunyip.com, gopher-news@boombox.micro.umn.edu
Message-ID: <01H8G9R6R64G0001SR@CEPES.RO>
X-Envelope-to: gopher-news@boombox.micro.umn.edu, bajan@bunyip.com, iafa@bunyip.com, uri@bunyip.com, nir@mailbase.ac.uk, iiir@merit.edu, srs@merit.edu, us-wg@nic.near.net, wais-talk@quake.think.com, ietf-wnils@ucdavis.edu, PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU, www-talk@www0.cern.ch
X-VMS-To: @NET.DIS
X-VMS-Cc: MONICA
Comments: This message was sent with 4.0
CEPES UNESCO Feb. 3, 1994 QUESTIONNAIRE ============= on Institutional Evaluation and Accreditation System(s) in Higher Education =============================================== Following the recent approval of the Low on Accreditation on Academic Evaluation and Accreditation in Romania, CEPES-UNESCO has launched, under the auspices of the World Bank, and with the agreement of the Romanian Ministry of Education, two pilot-projects in the field. The main objectives are to assess and test various evaluation mechanisms on different types of higher education institutions, as well as to improve the methodology of the evaluation procedure(a problem all countries in Central and Eastern Europe are facing), including the methodology for granting a national diploma. We would very much appreciate if you could assist us in the accomplishment of this extremely difficult task by accepting an exchange of information on the following questions: 1. Have you implemented an/more evaluation system(s) of higher education in your country? ......................................................... 2. If Yes, what kind of system is it: governmental/nongovernmental? ......................................................... ......................................................... 3. Does the evaluation/accreditation of an institution take place at the latter's request? Who supports its cost? ......................................................... ......................................................... 4. Are performance indicators used in this procedure? Which factors are involved in the elaboration of these indicators? ......................................................... ......................................................... 5. In the evaluation process, do you distinguish between quality assurance and quality control? Who is in charge of accomplishing each of them? ......................................................... ......................................................... 6. Does your Evaluation Board/Comittee have any permanent members? If yes, how many? Which is their term of office? ......................................................... ......................................................... 7. Is it compulsory to resort to foreign evaluators in this process? ......................................................... ......................................................... ......................................................... 8. To whom is the evaluation report submitted by the Board/Comittee? ......................................................... ......................................................... 9. Is the report made public? ......................................................... ......................................................... 10. To what extent could the minister of education make use of the results of this report in the implementation of appropiate policies and strategies of action, particularly in the financing of higher education? ......................................................... ......................................................... ......................................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CEPES UNESCO Jan. 12 1993 Suite la rcente adoptation de la Loi sur l'Evaluation de l'Habilitation acadmique en Roumanie, le CEPES-UNESCO, sous les auspices de la Banque Mondiale et avec l'accord du Ministre de l'Enseignement , a lanc deux projects-pilot dans le domain concern. Le but principal en est de tester les mcamismes d'valuation sur les diffrents types d'tablissement d'enseignement suprieur, d'amliorer la mthodologie d'un tel processus (problme auquel se confronte d'ailleurs tous les pays de l'Europe centrale et Orientale, de mme que la mthodologie d'un examen national de licence). Pour nous aider dans cette tche extremement difficile, nous vous saurions de bien vouloir recepter un echange d'informations sur les questions suivantes: QUESTIONNAIRE ============= sur Les systmes d'valuation et d'habilitation institutionnelle dans l'enseignement suprieur =============================================== 1. Avez-vous mis en place dans votre pays un, des systmes d'valuation de l'enseignement suprieur? ......................................................... 2. Si oui, de quel type ? Gouvernemental ? Non-gouvernemental? ......................................................... 3. L'valuation l'habilitation d'un tablissement se fait-ell sur la demande de l'institution respective? Qui en supporte le cot? ............................................................... ............................................................... ............................................................... ............................................................... ............................................................... 4. Utilisez-vous des indicateurs de performance dans ce processus? Quels sont les facteurs impliques dans l'laboration de ceux-ci? ............................................................... ............................................................... 5. L'valuation permet-elle de distinquer entre l'assurance de la qualit et le contrle de celle-ci?............................. ................................................................ ................................................................ Qui est responsable de l'une et de l'autre?..................... ................................................................ 6. Le Comit d'Evaluation a-t-il des membres permanents? Combien? Pour quelle dure?.................................................... ................................................................. ................................................................. 7. Y a-t-il des spcialistes trangers obligativement impliqus dans ce processus?...................................................... ................................................................ ................................................................ 8. A qui s'adresse le rapport d'valuation du comit?.............. ................................................................ ................................................................ ................................................................ 9. Est-il rendu public?............................................ 10. Dans quelle messure le ministre de l'enseignement peut s'en servir pour l'tablissement des politiques d'action pour une stratgie qui puisse utiliser d'une manire adquate les rsultats de celui-ci surtout pour le financement? ..................................... .................................................................. .................................................................. .................................................................. .................................................................. ..................................................................
- Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire Monica Cucoanes
- Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire Monica Cucoanes