IETF/RARE NIR WG Agenda

Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk Fri, 08 October 1993 17:53 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08377; 8 Oct 93 13:53 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08373; 8 Oct 93 13:53 EDT
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17739; 8 Oct 93 13:53 EDT
Via: uk.ac.mailbase; Fri, 8 Oct 1993 18:52:56 +0100
X-Version: Mailbase (TM) Enhanced List Manager Version 2.3
Received: from [+JANET.000001500100/FTP.MAIL] by uk.ac.mailbase; Fri, 8 Oct 1993 18:50:46 +0100
Received: from burnmoor.ncl.ac.uk by cheviot.ncl.ac.uk id <AA16352@cheviot.ncl.ac.uk> (5.65cVUW/NCL-CMA.1.35 for <nir@mailbase.ac.uk>) with SMTP; Fri, 8 Oct 1993 18:50:41 +0100
Received: from tuda.ncl.ac.uk (tuda.ncl.ac.uk [128.240.2.1]) by burnmoor.ncl.ac.uk (8.5/generic.cf(V8.5.1.5)) with ESMTP id RAA21031; Fri, 8 Oct 1993 17:51:42 GMT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk
Received: from [128.240.3.13] (dash2.ncl.ac.uk [128.240.3.13]) by tuda.ncl.ac.uk (8.5/generic.cf(V8.5.1.5)) with SMTP id SAA27626; Fri, 8 Oct 1993 18:50:35 +0100
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1993 18:50:35 +0100
Message-Id: <199310081750.SAA27626@tuda.ncl.ac.uk>
To: nir@mailbase.ac.uk, wg-isus@rare.nl, ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
X-Sender: njf@eata.ncl.ac.uk
Subject: IETF/RARE NIR WG Agenda
Cc: Megan Davies Walnut <mwalnut@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
X-List: nir@uk.ac.mailbase
Reply-To: Jill.Foster@newcastle.ac.uk
X-Orig-Sender: nir-request@mailbase.ac.uk
Precedence: list

Here is the agenda for our meeting in Houston.

RARE ISUS WG  members will discuss some of these agenda items at our
meeting next week in Warsaw.

-- Jill


IETF/RARE  Networked Information Retrieval Working Group Meeting
 
 Date:  Wednesday November 3rd

 Time:  13:30 - 15:30 

Place: Houston, Texas

 Chairs:   Jill Foster   - University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                George Brett - CNIDR
               

 Agenda
 ------
 
 1.  Approval of the Agenda

 2.  Status report on CNIDR (and maybe InterNIC?)

 3.  Status report on RARE related activities

 4. NIR status Report:
   - final update and comments before the publication as RFC
   - maintenance

 5. NIR evaluation:
      This is one of the areas where I feel we got carried away.
         We need to re-think what we want to do here.

6. Review of the charter. 
     NIR was set up to act as a clearing house for information on 
        what is going on in this area. The report was the natural first
        move on this. There are other things we could do to improve 
        current awareness of what is going on.

 7. Any other business


References:

ftp://mailbase.ac.uk/pub/lists/nir/files/nir.status.report
gopher://mailbase.ac.uk/Mailbase Lists/nir/Other Files/nir.status.report