Re: A plea for stability

Mike Schwartz <schwartz@latour.cs.colorado.edu> Sat, 27 March 1993 18:56 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04397; 27 Mar 93 13:56 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04393; 27 Mar 93 13:56 EST
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10979; 27 Mar 93 13:56 EST
Via: uk.ac.mailbase; Sat, 27 Mar 1993 18:53:44 +0000
Received: from [+JANET.000040010500/FTP.MAIL] by uk.ac.mailbase; Sat, 27 Mar 1993 18:50:00 GMT
Received: from latour.cs.colorado.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <sg.21658-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>; Sat, 27 Mar 1993 18:49:26 +0000
Received: by latour.cs.colorado.edu id AA20475 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for NIR@mailbase.ac.uk); Sat, 27 Mar 1993 11:49:24 -0700
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1993 11:49:24 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mike Schwartz <schwartz@latour.cs.colorado.edu>
Message-Id: <199303271849.AA20475@latour.cs.colorado.edu>
To: NIR@mailbase.ac.uk
Subject: Re: A plea for stability
Cc: bcn@isi.edu
Reply-To: Mike Schwartz <schwartz@latour.cs.colorado.edu>
X-Orig-Sender: nir-request@mailbase.ac.uk

I second the motion.  Thanks Cliff

Now what will probably happen is that several new working groups will be
created to discuss where the one list should be :-)
 - Mike