Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire
Monica Cucoanes <MONICA@cepes.ro> Fri, 04 February 1994 00:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21659; 3 Feb 94 19:06 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21652; 3 Feb 94 19:06 EST
Received: from nisp.ncl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23621; 3 Feb 94 19:06 EST
Received: by nisp.mailbase.ac.uk id <AA24126@nisp.mailbase.ac.uk> (5.65cVUW/MAILBASE.2.0 ); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 23:56:20 GMT
Message-Id: <199402032356.AA24126@nisp.mailbase.ac.uk>
X-Version: Mailbase (TM) Enhanced List Manager Version 2.3
Received: from [+JANET.000040010500/FTP.MAIL] by nisp.mailbase.ac.uk id <AA24082@nisp.mailbase.ac.uk> (5.65cVUW/MAILBASE.2.0 ); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 23:56:07 GMT
Received: from ROEARN.ICI.AC.RO by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <sg.25013-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>; Thu, 3 Feb 1994 21:00:12 +0000
Received: from CEPES.RO (MONICA) by ROEARN (MX V3.1C) with BSMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 1994 14:51:52 +0200
Received: from CEPES.RO by CEPES.RO (PMDF #12540) id <01H8GA06CQOG0001SR@CEPES.RO>; Thu, 3 Feb 1994 14:18 MET
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 1994 14:18:00 -0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Monica Cucoanes <MONICA@cepes.ro>
Subject: Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire
To: hsavolai@convex.csc.fi, schnitzer@his.de, sigrid.holtermann@admin.uio.no, mat@sco.msvsr.sk, andr@sspa.msk.su, jvberkom@kub.nl, kempff@kub.nl, s211keno@kub.nl, piet@kub.nl, martin@kub.nl, teun@kub.nl, solke@kub.nl, bacher@bmwf.gv.at, lestinen@tukki.jyu.fi, andrey@idenet.isrir.msk.su, MHO@nauvax.ucc.nau.edu, nir@mailbase.ac.uk, ososo <ososo%BITNET.BGCICT@roearn.ici.ro>, mifmo09d@d5.ub.es, John.Hopkins@csc.fi, pavel@center.unicor.free.net, Message-Id: 01H8GA06CQOG0001SR@cepes.ro;
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at CNRI.Reston.VA.US
X-Envelope-To: sigrid.holtermann@admin.uio.no, ososo@bgcict.bitnet, bacher@bmwf.gv.at, pavel@center.unicor.free.net, hsavolai@convex.csc.fi, John.Hopkins@csc.fi, mifmo09d@d5.ub.es, h267kir@ella2.sztaki.hu, schnitzer@his.de, andrey@idenet.isrir.msk.su, jvberkom@kub.nl, kempff@kub.nl, martin@kub.nl, piet@kub.nl, s211keno@kub.nl, solke@kub.nl, teun@kub.nl, nir@mailbase.ac.uk, MHO@NAUVAX.UCC.NAU.EDU, X-Vms-To: @LO.DIS
X-Vms-Cc: MONICA
X-List: nir@uk.ac.mailbase
Reply-To: Monica Cucoanes <MONICA@cepes.ro>
X-Orig-Sender: nir-request@mailbase.ac.uk
Precedence: list
CEPES UNESCO Jan. 12 1994 QUESTIONNAIRE ============= on Institutional Evaluation and Accreditation System(s) in Higher Education =============================================== Following the recent approval of the Low on Accreditation on Academic Evaluation and Accreditation in Romania, CEPES-UNESCO has launched, under the auspices of the World Bank, and with the agreement of the Romanian Ministry of Education, two pilot-projects in the field. The main objectives are to assess and test various evaluation mechanisms on different types of higher education institutions, as well as to improve the methodology of the evaluation procedure(a problem all countries in Central and Eastern Europe are facing), including the methodology for granting a national diploma. We would very much appreciate if you could assist us in the accomplishment of this extremely difficult task by accepting an exchange of information on the following questions: 1. Have you implemented an/more evaluation system(s) of higher education in your country? ......................................................... 2. If Yes, what kind of system is it: governmental/nongovernmental? ......................................................... ......................................................... 3. Does the evaluation/accreditation of an institution take place at the latter's request? Who supports its cost? ......................................................... ......................................................... 4. Are performance indicators used in this procedure? Which factors are involved in the elaboration of these indicators? ......................................................... ......................................................... 5. In the evaluation process, do you distinguish between quality assurance and quality control? Who is in charge of accomplishing each of them? ......................................................... ......................................................... 6. Does your Evaluation Board/Comittee have any permanent members? If yes, how many? Which is their term of office? ......................................................... ......................................................... 7. Is it compulsory to resort to foreign evaluators in this process? ......................................................... ......................................................... ......................................................... 8. To whom is the evaluation report submitted by the Board/Comittee? ......................................................... ......................................................... 9. Is the report made public? ......................................................... ......................................................... 10. To what extent could the minister of education make use of the results of this report in the implementation of appropiate policies and strategies of action, particularly in the financing of higher education? ......................................................... ......................................................... ......................................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CEPES UNESCO Feb. 3, 1993 Suite ` la ricente adoptation de la Loi sur l'Evaluation de l'Habilitation acadimique en Roumanie, le CEPES-UNESCO, sous les auspices de la Banque Mondiale et avec l'accord du Ministhre de l'Enseignement , a lanci deux projects-pilot dans le domain concerni. Le but principal en est de tester les micamismes d'ivaluation sur les diffirents types d'itablissement d'enseignement supirieur, d'amiliorer la mithodologie d'un tel processus (problhme auquel se confronte d'ailleurs tous les pays de l'Europe centrale et Orientale, de mjme que la mithodologie d'un examen national de licence). Pour nous aider dans cette tbche extremement difficile, nous vous saurions de bien vouloir recepter un echange d'informations sur les questions suivantes: QUESTIONNAIRE ============= sur Les systhmes d'ivaluation et d'habilitation institutionnelle dans l'enseignement supirieur =============================================== 1. Avez-vous mis en place dans votre pays un, des systhmes d'ivaluation de l'enseignement supirieur? ......................................................... 2. Si oui, de quel type ? Gouvernemental ? Non-gouvernemental? ......................................................... 3. L'ivaluation l'habilitation d'un itablissement se fait-ell sur la demande de l'institution respective? Qui en supporte le co{t? ............................................................... ............................................................... ............................................................... ............................................................... ............................................................... 4. Utilisez-vous des indicateurs de performance dans ce processus? Quels sont les facteurs impliques dans l'ilaboration de ceux-ci? ............................................................... ............................................................... 5. L'ivaluation permet-elle de distinquer entre l'assurance de la qualiti et le contrtle de celle-ci?............................. ................................................................ ................................................................ Qui est responsable de l'une et de l'autre?..................... ................................................................ 6. Le Comiti d'Evaluation a-t-il des membres permanents? Combien? Pour quelle durie?.................................................... ................................................................. ................................................................. 7. Y a-t-il des spicialistes itrangers obligativement impliquis dans ce processus?...................................................... ................................................................ ................................................................ 8. A qui s'adresse le rapport d'ivaluation du comiti?.............. ................................................................ ................................................................ ................................................................ 9. Est-il rendu public?............................................ 10. Dans quelle messure le ministre de l'enseignement peut s'en servir pour l'itablissement des politiques d'action pour une stratigie qui puisse utiliser d'une manihre adiquate les risultats de celui-ci surtout pour le financement? ..................................... .................................................................. .................................................................. .................................................................. .................................................................. ..................................................................
- Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire Monica Cucoanes
- Re: CEPES UNESCO questionnaire Monica Cucoanes