[nmrg] FYI/Qs: liaison on ITU-T work on intent based networking (SG13-LS181)

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 01 October 2020 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4095C3A0FA5 for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 04:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id alr4KjMEJ4gI for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 04:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4F73A0FA4 for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 04:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF443548045; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 13:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id D8850440059; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 13:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 13:57:30 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: nmrg@irtf.org, anima@ietf.org
Cc: chair@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, Scott.Mansfield@Ericsson.com, zhangy88@chinatelecom.cn, tsbsg13@itu.int
Message-ID: <20201001115730.GA38103@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/vTNh9pmnwPW6IPwyrkXrqCzg1HU>
Subject: [nmrg] FYI/Qs: liaison on ITU-T work on intent based networking (SG13-LS181)
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:57:38 -0000

FYI: anima, nmrg

  The ITU-T work about scenarios and requirements for intent based networking (SG13-LS181) might be
  of interest to participants to NMRG, ANIMA (if of RG/WG also work on this, pls. let me know and
  forward). I also just stumbled across it due to the following liaison statement posted on datatracker
  and did not have the time to read the work:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1696/

CC Q: (chair, IESG, Scott, Zhang):

  Q1: I am somewhat clueless about the liaison statement. I see some liasons being Cc'ed widely 
  to interested parties in the IETF, whereas this liaison is not copied to any actual
  groups other than leadership. How is distribution and response responsibility being decided on ?

  Q2: IETF/IRTF has done / is doing work on intent and network archtiectures planning to suport
  intent, for example in NMRG and ANIMA (maybe other WGs as well). What is the appropriate way to
  let ITU-T know about this (if such dissemination of information is of interest to IETF at all... ?)

Cheers
    Toerless