Re: [nmrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-sla-violation-detection-09.txt

Hi Brian.
Thanks for the comments.
Answers below.

Em seg, 26 de jun de 2017 às 21:12, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> > 7.  Implementation Considerations
> >
> >    The active measurement model assumes that a typical
> infrastructure will have multiple network segments and Autonomous Systems
> (ASs), and  a reasonably large number of routers.
>
> Could the authors clarify what they mean by Autonomous System?
> Is this intended in the precise sense of a BGP4 AS or in a more
> general way?
>

Yes, AS in the I-D can be read as a BGP AS. In any case, we are just
describing a active measurement model at this point.

>
> This is important for the applicability of the ANIMA solutions to
> this use case, since it is hard to imagine an ANIMA Autonomic Control
> Plane extending beyond a single BGP4 AS, and certainly not beyond
> a single administrative domain.
>

Agreed, but the solution described in our I-D considers cooperative peers.
Thus, it is safe to say that it targets single administrative domains which
means that the ACP could be used.

>
> Have the authors already studied the applicability of the ANIMA
> solutions?
>

We did not study the applicability of ANIMA solutions for this I-D, but we
have plans to do in a new one if a new ANIMA charter allow such possibility.

>
> Regards
>    Brian Carpenter
>

Best.
Jéferson

>
> _______________________________________________
> nmrg mailing list
> nmrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg
>