Additional mailing list?
Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net> Tue, 16 July 1996 13:42 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01327;
16 Jul 96 9:42 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01323;
16 Jul 96 9:42 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07750;
16 Jul 96 9:42 EDT
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by
pheasant.academ.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA09612 for
<ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 08:41:21 -0500
Received: from worf.netins.net (root@worf.netins.net [167.142.225.4]) by
academ.com (8.7.5/8.7.1) with ESMTP id IAA21175 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>;
Tue, 16 Jul 1996 08:41:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from worf.netins.net (grobe@worf.netins.net [167.142.225.4]) by
worf.netins.net (8.7.5/8.7.2) with SMTP id IAA04075 for
<ietf-nntp@academ.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 08:41:18 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 08:41:17 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net>
Reply-To: Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net>
To: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: Additional mailing list?
In-Reply-To: <199607160628.BAA16773@academ.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.94.960716082017.3281B-100000@worf.netins.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Stan Barber wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jul 1996 13:30:57 -0500 (CDT) Jonathan Grobe wrote: > > > > > I have no idea of when INN 1.5 is going to come out. If it will be a > > > while, I believe this command should be discussed now to see if this > > > list thinks any changes should be made. For example: > > > > I agree with Jonathan that the command could use some discussion, but > > Stan's right--it's not appropriate for an existing practise document. > > Okey. I would rather it not occur on this list. Would another list > be better or should I set up an inn-discuss list? No. It is not an inn-discuss list which should be created, rather it is a forum for the discussion of new technology. Besides test messages one of the first posts here was from someone who wanted to discuss a Search command. There a number of people who do not want to wait until this draft is finalized before discussing these. Perhaps you could set up an additional list (nntp-extensions?), if you are opposed to discussing new technology here.
- Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions … Stan Barber
- Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions … Brian Kantor
- Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions … Stan Barber
- Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions … Ben Polk
- Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions … Stan Barber
- Additional mailing list? Jonathan Grobe