Re: ietf-nntp My notes from the NNTP WG meeting at the 37th IETF

Jack De Winter <jack@wildbear.on.ca> Thu, 19 December 1996 19:13 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11773; 19 Dec 96 14:13 EST
Received: from ACADEM2.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17404; 19 Dec 96 14:13 EST
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by academ2.academ.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) id NAA16389 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:11:07 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Warning: academ2.academ.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by academ2.academ.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA16384 for <ietf-nntp@ACADEM2.ACADEM.COM>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:11:04 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lacroix.wildbear.on.ca (lacroix.wildbear.on.ca [199.246.132.198]) by academ.com (8.8.3/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA15489 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 13:11:01 -0600 (CST)
Received: by lacroix.wildbear.on.ca from localhost (router,SLMailNT V3.0); Thu, 19 Dec 1996 14:04:50 -0500
Received: by lacroix.wildbear.on.ca from wildside.wildbear.on.ca (199.246.132.193::mail daemon,SLMailNT V3.0); Thu, 19 Dec 1996 14:04:49 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19961219140932.00e4d204@lacroix>
X-Sender: "Jack De Winter" <jack@wildbear.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 14:09:33 -0500
To: Brian Hernacki <bhern@netscape.com>, Nat Ballou <NatBa@microsoft.com>
From: Jack De Winter <jack@wildbear.on.ca>
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp My notes from the NNTP WG meeting at the 37th IETF
Cc: Brian Kantor <brian@nothing.ucsd.edu>, Chris.Newman@innosoft.com, moore@cs.utk.edu, ietf-nntp@academ.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

>As far as protocol goes, Netscape News Server will accept an AUTHINFO
>USER, return a "381 PASS required", but still allow you to enter other
>commands without having entered AUTHINFO PASS. It does not however, use
>the USER information (even for readership stats) unless a password has
>been provided to prove identity.

So, I guess then, if we can find one other server like that, we could
argue that it should go into the 977bis draft to allow other commands
but not to act on the 'verified' user until the use is indeed verified
with the AUTHINFO PASS command?

regards,
Jack
-------------------------------------------------
Jack De Winter - Wildbear Consulting, Inc.
(519) 576-3873		http://www.wildbear.on.ca/

Author of SLMail(95/NT) (http://www.seattlelab.com/) and other great products.