IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ietf-nntp Thoughts on renaming X commands

rsalz@osf.org Thu, 03 October 1996 20:21 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa21496; 3 Oct 96 16:21 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21496; 3 Oct 96 16:21 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA28373 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 15:19:03 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA28369 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 15:19:01 -0500
Received: from mailbox.osf.org (mailbox.osf.org [130.105.1.8]) by academ.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) with SMTP id PAA20591 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 15:18:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: rsalz@osf.org
Received: from sulphur.osf.org (sulphur [130.105.1.123]) by mailbox.osf.org (8.6.12/8.6.x) with SMTP id QAA20189; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 16:18:17 -0400
Received: by sulphur.osf.org (1.38.193.4/4.7) id AA06846; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 16:16:48 -0400
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 16:16:48 -0400
Message-Id: <9610032016.AA06846@sulphur.osf.org>
To: bpolk@netscape.com, ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp Thoughts on renaming X commands
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

I think it is a bad idea to follow some false sense of purity and
render all millions of client/server pairs nonconforming.

I had this discussion with Stan once before.  I stll agree with Ben.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email