IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ietf-nntp Initial draft FINALLY available

Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org> Wed, 02 October 1996 15:39 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa10346; 2 Oct 96 11:39 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12734; 2 Oct 96 11:39 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA24733 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 10:34:00 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA24729 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 10:33:58 -0500
Received: from postman.osf.org (postman.osf.org [130.105.1.152]) by academ.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) with ESMTP id KAA25366; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 10:33:57 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from sulphur.osf.org (sulphur.osf.org [130.105.1.123]) by postman.osf.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA23032; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 11:33:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Received: by sulphur.osf.org (1.38.193.4/4.7) id AA03853; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 11:31:56 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 11:31:56 -0400
Message-Id: <9610021531.AA03853@sulphur.osf.org>
To: evanc@synapse.net, rsalz@osf.org, sob@academ.com
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp Initial draft FINALLY available
Cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

>Nothing in the document (as written) precludes it operating on any other
>port. The document (as written) requires it to use 119 if it is to
>be compliant with the document. It seems that MUST should become SHOULD
>given the messages I have seen so far. More comments from others?

No.  MUST becomes "see elsewhere for the assignment of protocols to ports."

As the Buddhists say, mu.  Unask the question.
	/r$

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email