Re: ietf-nntp Initial draft FINALLY available

Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Wed, 02 October 1996 14:09 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa01938; 2 Oct 96 10:09 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10003; 2 Oct 96 10:09 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA24051 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:07:47 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA24047 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:07:45 -0500
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) id JAA22072; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:07:44 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199610021407.JAA22072@academ.com>
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:07:43 CDT
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Evan Champion <evanc@synapse.net>
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp Initial draft FINALLY available
Cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

> Stan Barber wrote:
> > > Port 119 is the default, but it isn't required that the server listen there.
> > 
> > Is it really an NNTP service if it is not on port 119, or is it a service
> > that supports NNTP? I think it is really NNTP if it is on port 119, otherwise
> > it is a service that used the NNTP protocol.
> 
> If a server running on port X talks NNTP for the purpose of serving news
> to NNTP clients or other servers, then IMHO it is an NNTP server and
> should be covered by this document.

What is the point of having a IANA assigned port number then? What if I
chose to run an HTTP server on port 119?


-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.