Past Problems Achieving NNTP community consensus?

Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net> Thu, 04 July 1996 03:49 UTC

Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 22:44:08 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net>
Reply-To: Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net>
cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: Past Problems Achieving NNTP community consensus?
In-Reply-To: <199607040322.WAA22241@academ.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.94.960703223342.32701A-100000@worf.netins.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, Stan Barber wrote:

> Anne writes:
> > 
> > My impression was not that *documents* would be scrutinized, but that,
> > because of past problems getting the NNTP community to come to
> > consensus, there might be a problem letting us form a working group at
> > all unless the *charter* (well, I guess that's a document too :-) )
> > was very clear, and defined a very limited amount of work.
> 
> I think your statement is definately closer to what was said than mine, so
> I will update the draft along those lines.
> 
Could someone explain the past problems in getting the NNTP community
to come to a consensus? Why for example did the effort in 1991 to
revise the standard fail?

Re: DRAFT minutes from the BOF Anne Bennett
Re: DRAFT minutes from the BOF Stan Barber
Re: DRAFT minutes from the BOF Stan Barber
Past Problems Achieving NNTP community consensus? Jonathan Grobe
Draft of 1991-1992 Revision Availability? Jonathan Grobe