Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5?)

Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Tue, 16 July 1996 06:29 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07067; 16 Jul 96 2:29 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07063; 16 Jul 96 2:29 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02730; 16 Jul 96 2:29 EDT
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.academ.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA09072 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 01:28:43 -0500
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.7.5/8.7.1) id BAA16773; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 01:28:41 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199607160628.BAA16773@academ.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 01:28:41 CDT
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: "James A. Brister" <brister@vix.com>, Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net>
Subject: Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5?)
Cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com

> 
> On Mon, 15 Jul 1996 13:30:57 -0500 (CDT)  Jonathan Grobe wrote:
> 
> > I have no idea of when INN 1.5 is going to come out. If it will be a 
> > while, I believe this command should be discussed now to see if this
> > list thinks any changes should be made. For example:
> 
> I agree with Jonathan that the command could use some discussion, but
> Stan's right--it's not appropriate for an existing practise document.

Okey. I would rather it not occur on this list. Would another list
be better or should I set up an inn-discuss list? Some other possibilities:

	nntp-managers@apple.com (usually an ops-type list)
	newsgroup: news.software.nntp
	[some where else?]

James, it's really your call. I would be happy to host the inn-discuss list
here if you'd like that.

-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.