Re: ietf-nntp Comments on the draft

Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Thu, 10 October 1996 23:01 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa03695; 10 Oct 96 19:01 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23419; 10 Oct 96 19:01 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA08434 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 17:56:32 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA08430 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 17:56:30 -0500
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) id RAA11553; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 17:56:28 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199610102256.RAA11553@academ.com>
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 17:56:27 CDT
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: "chris (c.) lewis" <clewis@nortel.ca>, ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp Comments on the draft
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

The extensions draft documents existing practice.
The NNTP protocol document is based on existing practice, but CLARIFIES and
FIXES issues. This is an issue that must be fixed.


We can't use 8 for extensions and use 8 for authentication. It makes no sense
to do that.

-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.