IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ietf-nntp Thoughts on renaming X commands

Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> Wed, 16 October 1996 04:26 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa05497; 16 Oct 96 0:26 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01623; 16 Oct 96 0:26 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA18287 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 23:24:17 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA18283 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 23:24:16 -0500
Received: from ig.cs.utk.edu (IG.CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.149]) by academ.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) with ESMTP id XAA02004 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 23:24:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost by ig.cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.11c-UTK) id AAA17080; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 00:24:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199610160424.AAA17080@ig.cs.utk.edu>
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: NetWin Support <netwin@world.std.com>
cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com, moore@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp Thoughts on renaming X commands
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Oct 1996 15:28:12 -0000." <02282368500021@netwin.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 00:24:04 -0400
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

> >the purpose of the doing this work in the first place.
> 
> To document existing practice and define a mechanism for future work?

Yes, this is what we discussed at the Montreal BOF:

1. Document existing practice
2. Define an extension negotiation mechanism
3. After (and only after) the above two are done, the group can 
   review suggested extensions that people want to submit.

Keith

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email