Re: ietf-nntp re: batch, streaming, Adding extensions?

Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Tue, 13 August 1996 14:15 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa29168; 13 Aug 96 10:15 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa29164; 13 Aug 96 10:15 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06712; 13 Aug 96 10:15 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA03997 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:04:14 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA03993 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 14:04:12 -0500
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.7.5/8.7.1) id JAA18235; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 09:03:38 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199608131403.JAA18235@academ.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 09:03:38 CDT
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Bob Sloane <SLOANE@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp re: batch, streaming, Adding extensions?
Cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

> > Isn't INN 1.4unoff4 an unofficial release of INN?
> 
> Do you really want to get into an argument about what is "official"
> and what isn't?  INN 1.4unoff4 is in widespread use, and is publically
> available.  Whether it is an "official" release or not doen't seem
> that important to me.

No, I don't want to get into an arguement about this. I do want to be
clear in what my criteria are. Since INN 1.5 will have this functionality 
in it and it is an official release (that is officially supported by the
author), then that will meet my criteria. 



-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.