ietf-nntp Mention port 433 in draft?

Jonathan Grobe <grobe@worf.netins.net> Tue, 16 September 1997 06:11 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa06506; 16 Sep 97 2:11 EDT
Received: from announcer.academ.com (majordomo@ANNOUNCER.ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.60]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid CAA07718 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 02:14:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by announcer.academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA05423; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:09:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by announcer.academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA05418 for <ietf-nntp@ANNOUNCER.ACADEM.COM>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:09:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ins2.netins.net (ins2.netins.net [167.142.225.2]) by academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA21622 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:08:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from worf.netins.net (grobe@worf.netins.net [167.142.225.4]) by ins2.netins.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id BAA23165 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:08:52 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:08:52 -0500
From: Jonathan Grobe <grobe@worf.netins.net>
cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: ietf-nntp Mention port 433 in draft?
In-Reply-To: <9709040740.aa05029@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.970916010702.9412A-100000@worf.netins.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

From the draft:
> When running over TCP/IP, the official port for the
> NNTP service is 119.

There was recently a thread in news.software.nntp

            Re: proposal: separate ports for xfer and client access
                                      
From           markd@mira.net (Mark Delany)

c.c.eiftj@64.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) writes:

>Brief proposal:  We need separate port numbers for nntp xfer access
>and nntp client access.

It's been done. It's been allocated. It's:

nnsp            433/tcp         usenet          # Network News Transfer

NNTP remains as the reader port (obviously).



Should a comment be added somewhere mentioning port 433?