Re: ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal
Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org> Wed, 11 December 1996 04:52 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa17335; 10 Dec 96 23:52 EST
Received: from ACADEM2.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00914;
10 Dec 96 23:52 EST
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by academ2.academ.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) id
WAA09541 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:50:01 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Warning: academ2.academ.com: majordomo set sender to
owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by
academ2.academ.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA09536 for
<ietf-nntp@ACADEM2.ACADEM.COM>; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:49:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: from postman.osf.org (postman.osf.org [130.105.1.152]) by academ.com
(8.8.3/8.7.1) with ESMTP id WAA12048 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>;
Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:49:48 -0600 (CST)
Received: from sulphur.osf.org (sulphur.osf.org [130.105.1.123]) by
postman.osf.org (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA06809;
Tue, 10 Dec 1996 23:48:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Received: by sulphur.osf.org (1.38.193.4/4.7) id AA22690;
Tue, 10 Dec 1996 23:46:52 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 23:46:52 -0500
Message-Id: <9612110446.AA22690@sulphur.osf.org>
To: bhern@netscape.com
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal
Cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk
In the original INN design, I suggested 'AUTHINFO GENERIC mechanism' so that AUTHINFO could have new subcommands and not get them confused with possible new security mechanisms, so AUTHINFO LIST could be done, e.g.
- ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal Nat Ballou
- Re: ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal Rich Salz
- Re: ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal Brian Hernacki
- Re: ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal Nat Ballou
- Re: ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal Brian Hernacki
- Re: ietf-nntp AUTHINFO GENERIC (no args) proposal Rich Salz