Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5?
Paul Southworth <pauls@locust.cic.net> Mon, 15 July 1996 13:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11744;
15 Jul 96 9:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11740;
15 Jul 96 9:46 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07674;
15 Jul 96 9:46 EDT
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by
pheasant.academ.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA06800 for
<ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 08:45:47 -0500
Received: from locust.cic.net (root@locust.cic.net [192.131.22.8]) by
academ.com (8.7.5/8.7.1) with ESMTP id IAA07753 for <ietf-nntp@academ.com>;
Mon, 15 Jul 1996 08:45:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (pauls@localhost) by locust.cic.net (8.7.4/8.7.3)
with SMTP id JAA27674; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 09:45:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 09:45:34 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Southworth <pauls@locust.cic.net>
To: Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net>
cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.94.960715083038.29298B-100000@worf.netins.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960715094046.27575C-100000@locust.cic.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Mon, 15 Jul 1996, Jonathan Grobe wrote: > I quite disagree. I believe that if new NNTP extensions are included > INN 1.5 (such as mode streaming?) they should be included in RFC 977 bis. > I do not think it a good thing for RFC 977 bis to be released and a > couple months later INN 1.5 comes out with a number of additional > extensions. The ietf-nntp discussion group is open to the INN 1.5 developers, and I think you can count on the fact that they know about it. Right now people are being fairly tight-lipped about INN 1.5, and if the developers wish to participate here, I'm sure they're welcome to do so. Until such time, they're responsible for the software and nobody is going to crowbar the information out of them if they don't wish to discuss it. I plan on blindly trusting that they will speak their piece when they see fit, especially since there isn't any reasonable alternative. I suspect that they're aware there's significant interest in the future of INN (in fact, they're probably painfully aware of that fact). --Paul
- New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Jonathan Grobe
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Stan Barber
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Jonathan Grobe
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Paul Southworth
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Stan Barber
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Brian Kantor
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? James A. Brister
- XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions in I… Jonathan Grobe
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Ben Polk
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Stan Barber
- Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5? Stan Barber
- Re: XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions … James A. Brister