Re: ietf-nntp Mention port 433 in draft?

Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Tue, 16 September 1997 15:49 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa17665; 16 Sep 97 11:49 EDT
Received: from announcer.academ.com (majordomo@ANNOUNCER.ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.60]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid LAA08932 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 11:52:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by announcer.academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA08028; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 10:48:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by announcer.academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA08023 for <ietf-nntp@ANNOUNCER.ACADEM.COM>; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 10:48:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA26683; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 10:47:54 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199709161547.KAA26683@academ.com>
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 10:47:54 -0500
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Brian Kantor <brian@karoshi.ucsd.edu>, ietf-nntp@academ.com, news@ednet.co.uk
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp Mention port 433 in draft?
Cc: rob@wired.com
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

Brian writes:
> >Sometimes I've wondered if the standard could be better served by
> >formally splitting it into two "subprotocols" such as these. 
> 
> I believe that Rob's NNSP must be separately documented from NNTP.
> 
> 	- Brian
> 


I agree with Brian. 
-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.