IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ietf-nntp New draft available

Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Fri, 05 September 1997 18:37 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa17806; 5 Sep 97 14:37 EDT
Received: from announcer.academ.com (majordomo@ANNOUNCER.ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.60]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid OAA06951 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 14:40:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by announcer.academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA08790; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:36:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by announcer.academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA08785 for <ietf-nntp@ANNOUNCER.ACADEM.COM>; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:36:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13462; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:35:38 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199709051835.NAA13462@academ.com>
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 13:35:38 -0500
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Paul Overell <paulo@turnpike.com>, ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp New draft available
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

The only reason I added the option of using four digit years was to 
clearly deal with Y2K problems. I don't have a problem with the original
wording, but I have gotten comments from others about Y2K.

What do folks think?

-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email