ietf-nntp Re: nntp-extensions Character sets in draft-hernacki-nntpsrch-00
rsalz@osf.org Thu, 10 October 1996 01:53 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa29786; 9 Oct 96 21:53 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26272;
9 Oct 96 21:53 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
UAA06699 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 20:35:13 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to
owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (root@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by
pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA06692 for
<ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 20:35:09 -0500
Received: from mailbox.osf.org (mailbox.osf.org [130.105.1.8]) by academ.com
(8.7.6/8.7.1) with SMTP id UAA27231; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 20:35:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: rsalz@osf.org
Received: from sulphur.osf.org (sulphur [130.105.1.123]) by mailbox.osf.org
(8.6.12/8.6.x) with SMTP id UAA13724; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 20:05:29 -0400
Received: by sulphur.osf.org (1.38.193.4/4.7) id AA21127;
Wed, 9 Oct 1996 21:32:52 -0400
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 21:32:52 -0400
Message-Id: <9610100132.AA21127@sulphur.osf.org>
To: bpolk@netscape.com, djohnson@exchange.microsoft.com,
nntp-extensions@academ.com
Subject: ietf-nntp Re: nntp-extensions Character sets in
draft-hernacki-nntpsrch-00
Cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk
In correct practice, aren't inn and the NNTP ref implementation both 8bit clean? Certainly C News is. Can't we call B2.11 dead?