Re: Past Problems Achieving NNTP community consensus?
Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Thu, 04 July 1996 04:18 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05843;
4 Jul 96 0:18 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05839;
4 Jul 96 0:18 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01295;
4 Jul 96 0:18 EDT
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by
pheasant.academ.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA21500 for
<ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Thu, 4 Jul 1996 04:22:00 -0500
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.7.4/8.7.1) id XAA22611;
Wed, 3 Jul 1996 23:17:44 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199607040417.XAA22611@academ.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 23:17:44 CDT
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Jonathan Grobe <grobe@netins.net>
Subject: Re: Past Problems Achieving NNTP community consensus?
Cc: ietf-nntp@academ.com
Johnathan writes: > Could someone explain the past problems in getting the NNTP community > to come to a consensus? Why for example did the effort in 1991 to > revise the standard fail? In my personal opinion, the 1991 effort had a number of objectives and at the time had to spend time inventing alot of things to meet the objectives. So, one of the problems was the size of the task. Reaching consensus is much easier if the size of the task is small. There was also a number of very busy people involved in the work that had other important things going on other than work on the revision of RFC 977. Again, the size of the task was large relative to the collective resources available to bring to bear on the task. So, one of the main ideas in this group is to reduce the size of the task to some relatively specific goals and set up a framework for moving forward in smaller steps (instead of trying to do a large number of things at once). Also, we now have the benefit of a number of generic technologies (like the work on security done in other groups) that can be utilized to resolve some of the issues that required inventing technology in 1991. I'd welcome any other participant in the 1991 working group to offer their perspectives on that effort. -- Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob@academ.com Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.