Re: ietf-nntp Why are RFCs hard formatted?

Stan Barber <sob@academ.com> Mon, 30 September 1996 20:49 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa23210; 30 Sep 96 16:49 EDT
Received: from PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08731; 30 Sep 96 16:49 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA19680 for ietf-nntp-outgoing; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:46:00 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: pheasant.ACADEM.COM: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-nntp using -f
Received: from academ.com (sob@ACADEM.COM [198.137.249.2]) by pheasant.ACADEM.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA19676 for <ietf-nntp@PHEASANT.ACADEM.COM>; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:45:58 -0500
Received: (from sob@localhost) by academ.com (8.7.6/8.7.1) id PAA15611; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:45:58 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199609302045.PAA15611@academ.com>
From: Stan Barber <sob@academ.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:45:58 CDT
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: "J.B. Nicholson-Owens" <jbn@mystery-train.cu-online.com>, ietf-nntp@academ.com
Subject: Re: ietf-nntp Why are RFCs hard formatted?
Sender: owner-ietf-nntp@academ.com
Precedence: bulk

> Thanks for releasing the first draft of the NNTP spec.  Out of curiosity,
> why are RFCs distributed with hard page formatting, even RFCs that don't
> have tables of contents or internal references to pages?  Is there a place
> where unformatted RFCs can be downloaded?


You need to direct these questions to the RFC editor. I just do what
RFC 1543 says.

As far as I know, this is the only way to get RFC documents or 
Internet Drafts (unless you get them from the original author(s)).

Now if you are requesting that I release an "unformatted" version of
this document, I am willing to do that. Please let me know.

-- 
Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob@academ.com
Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.