Re: [Notifications] Statement of interest, and comments on scope

Graham Klyne wrote on 8/9/07 9:53 +0100:
> (a) an abstract notification model, presumably based on pub-sub, that can be
> layered over existing (and new) protocols and is not of itself specific to
> email (even though it does not take account of wider requirements), and
> (b) an email-specific part that addresses how email notifications can be
> conveyed by such a framework.

I consider it unlikely an IETF WG could reach closure on an abstract model on 
this topic.  However, the point you're trying to make about modularity of 
design is an important one.  Mail store implementers usually don't want to be 
experts about notification systems and notification system implementers usually 
don't want to be experts about mail stores.  A good design is likely to take 
that into account.

                - Chris

_______________________________________________
Notifications mailing list
Notifications@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/notifications