IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD

Glenn Trewitt <trewitt@pa.dec.com> Wed, 18 March 1992 21:47 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00343; 18 Mar 92 16:47 EST
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23757; 18 Mar 92 16:48 EST
Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23731; 18 Mar 92 16:47 EST
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA04152; Wed, 18 Mar 92 13:39:31 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA28381; Wed, 18 Mar 92 13:04:20 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA28360; Wed, 18 Mar 92 13:02:55 -0800
Message-Id: <9203182102.AA28360@nsl.pa.dec.com>
To: Bruce Crabill <BRUCE@umdd.umd.edu>
Cc: print-wg@pa.dec.com, Glenn Trewitt <trewitt@pa.dec.com>
Subject: Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 18 Mar 92 14:35:00 -0500. <9203181942.AA00166@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com>
Organization: DEC Network Systems Laboratory (Palo Alto, CA / UCH)
Phones: H:408-773-9239, W:415-688-1324, DTN:543-1324, Fax:415-324-2797
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 13:02:54 -0800
From: Glenn Trewitt <trewitt@pa.dec.com>
X-Mts: smtp

The agreement we reached in the meeting was that interopability issues
with 1179 would be addressed in a separate section.  It would
instruct about how a "new" daemon could survive an interaction with an
RFC 1179 daemon.
	- Glenn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email