IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD

Bruce Crabill <BRUCE@umdd.umd.edu> Tue, 17 March 1992 05:18 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00371; 17 Mar 92 0:18 EST
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19293; 17 Mar 92 0:19 EST
Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19289; 17 Mar 92 0:19 EST
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA24167; Mon, 16 Mar 92 21:19:47 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA07555; Mon, 16 Mar 92 20:28:45 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA07551; Mon, 16 Mar 92 20:28:42 -0800
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA21879; Mon, 16 Mar 92 20:28:33 -0800
Message-Id: <9203170428.AA21879@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com>
Received: by UMDD.UMD.EDU id 6219 ; 16 Mar 92 23:30:25 EST
Received: by UMDD (Mailer R2.07) id 6219; Mon, 16 Mar 92 23:30:24 EST
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1992 23:25:43 -0500
From: Bruce Crabill <BRUCE@umdd.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD
In-Reply-To: Message received on Mon, 16 Mar 92 15:36:06 EST
To: print-wg@pa.dec.com

It was a real injustice to the Internet community that RFC-1179 ever got out
there in the first place.  However, just because it is out there, is no
excuse to perpetuate a bad idea.  After all, it wasn't on the standards
track.  Interoperability is important.

                                       Bruce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email