Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD
Bruce Crabill <BRUCE@umdd.umd.edu> Wed, 18 March 1992 20:40 UTC
Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00337; 18 Mar 92 15:40 EST
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21711; 18 Mar 92 15:42 EST
Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21691; 18 Mar 92 15:41 EST
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA02120; Wed, 18 Mar 92 12:34:57 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA27471; Wed, 18 Mar 92 11:44:28 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA27467; Wed, 18 Mar 92 11:43:57 -0800
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA00166; Wed, 18 Mar 92 11:42:29 -0800
Message-Id: <9203181942.AA00166@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com>
Received: by UMDD.UMD.EDU id 0237 ; 18 Mar 92 14:44:01 EST
Received: by UMDD (Mailer R2.07) id 0237; Wed, 18 Mar 92 14:43:59 EST
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1992 14:35:00 -0500
From: Bruce Crabill <BRUCE@umdd.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD
In-Reply-To: Message received on Wed, 18 Mar 92 12:18:23 EST
To: print-wg@pa.dec.com
>>Interoperability is important. > >Full agreement. RFC 1179 was fully interoperable with the BSD 4.3 code. >It is essential that RFC-XXXX be fully interoperable with 1179 and 4.3. Sorry, I disagree. If a person picked up RFC 1179 and not ever having worked with a BSD 4.3 LPD tried to implement an LPR according to the RFC 1179 spec would end up with a LPR that would not interoperate with BSD 4.3 machines. It might very well work with the code that company sells, but RFC 1179 clearly states: "The Berkeley versions of the Unix(tm) operating system provide line printer spooling with a collection of programs: lpr (assign to queue), lpq (display the queue), lprm (remove from queue), and lpc (control the queue). These programs interact with an autonomous process called the line printer daemon. This RFC describes the protocols with which a line printer daemon client may control printing." In fact, it did not document the protocol as used by BSD. Please don't think that I'm saying that the BSD LPR protocol is perfect as is and doesn't need improvement, the operating system environment that I program in needs some of those enhancements that you made, however, you can't claim that RFC 1179 documented the BSD protocol when in reality it didn't. Bruce
- the latest draft, LPR-LPD Joel Gartland
- Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD Glenn Trewitt
- Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD leo j mclaughlin iii
- Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD Bruce Crabill
- Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD leo j mclaughlin iii
- Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD Bruce Crabill
- Re: the latest draft, LPR-LPD Glenn Trewitt