[Nsaas] Existing work, other things

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 12 August 2014 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE3D1A0119 for <nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NmjzZN4Ae3jm for <nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41221A010A for <nsaas@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hz1so12129089pad.36 for <nsaas@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4xx7RJfrYbQcbJkJLOskbYOgMGz7VBDe02DWyTbYrV0=; b=RPnvoJi/FRqO3dH9YqLzqOz8J5EsfjLHYXm9tzk3w8KK7pFzdv2dRX08psz3W7Fmrh rppKwgpzsryxeCCXWD+qvBlLbtK9Nc65oJpXKWR0pzUgIdhFKJtzF/DqmBC7x8lyvyDJ RTbU0bwbKKQdvFMLkhVukga/nO3j5DmG77/+mq0t2miTGzOn8dpixKphRfirtIw1Ijht bcv6M8y2YN/YAGXbZzCD0bXzZFdYRPs7HtTBkD5TyvkCZHOs0ScyKOGIPUDO3amz/FO3 EX/tjLKu8YIQRPj1OVlOIev+8E2udmY45CGsV+A3oYeoTXIwkAJtQVANgmOVwT38Rxfg ikhA==
X-Received: by 10.66.174.17 with SMTP id bo17mr1570706pac.98.1407810999319; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-123-104.dynamic.cdma.acsalaska.net. [216.67.123.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nt15sm19758903pdb.63.2014.08.11.19.36.38 for <nsaas@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53E97DB5.3040106@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:36:37 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nsaas@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nsaas/Ds5KON1wr15_LGmN-ZZUvDI-i8k
Subject: [Nsaas] Existing work, other things
X-BeenThere: nsaas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*NSaaS: Network Security as a Service mailing list*" <nsaas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nsaas>, <mailto:nsaas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsaas/>
List-Post: <mailto:nsaas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsaas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsaas>, <mailto:nsaas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:36:44 -0000

I was a little (okay, a lot) surprised to see this work
proposed without referencing prior IETF work in this space,
including (but not limited to) midcom, nsis, and pcp.
Ideally any new work proposed on this topic would include
an explanation of why it would succeed where previous
efforts haven't.  It's certainly possible that this might
succeed where others have failed, but some explanation
of why its proponents think this time things are different
would be helpful.  Some discussion of what distinguishes
"security" from other service functions would also be useful.

Also, the open source vs. standards discussion is overly
argumentative and likely to produce more heat than light,
and fails to acknowledge the complementary nature of the
two types of effort.  We certainly do not need more
unimplemented standards (see previous paragraph).

Melinda