[nscp] BoF request denied

Jelte Jansen <jelte@isc.org> Wed, 22 September 2010 18:35 UTC

Message-ID: <4C9A4BE9.50105@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:33:13 -0700
From: Jelte Jansen <jelte@isc.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nscp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [nscp] BoF request denied
Precedence: list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

the IESG/IAB have discussed the BoF request, and have decided that a BoF is 'not
needed'. To quote the message I got:

 "The IAB/IESG solidly supports the development of a YANG model for DNS
  configuration and would like the work to begin immediately.
  <snip>
  After some discussion, we decided that the DNSOPS should develop the YANG
  module. This supports an precedent established with SNMP MIBS (each WG is
  responsible to develop its own MIBs/YANG modules)."

I am talking to the dnsop chairs about this, and we are trying to figure out
what to do now. It is at this point unclear whether this is a question of 'mgmt
systems MUST use YANG', and we are waiting for an answer on this.

If this work is accepted by dnsop (this time...), it does mean a recharter
there, and it means that discussion on nscp should happen on their list.

However, for now, I think we should keep discussing scope (and technology, if
anyone has any input on that), here. If we have to move later, I'll try to find
a way to make the transfer as painless as possible.

Jelte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyaS+kACgkQ4nZCKsdOncXeXwCff1ORE2xcu07NvhMFs2VmNOh6
2goAniDsBX95yWWS5JxwQhE9PU0GIfs/
=ls8q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[nscp] BoF request denied Jelte Jansen