RE: [Nsis-imp] Assigned numbers for version GIMPS -06

hi,

the PI is only ever carried inside the NLI TLV, which includes
size information for it. i'm not clear if there is any need to
define a special TLV for it or a particular syntax (it is only
ever compared by exact matching).

i'm not sure what your question about the RAO value is. 
- the RAO is present in any query-encapsulated datagram
  message (including all Queries, and Data messages forwarded
  by stateless nodes)
- the RAO value of 0 is not realistic and in principle would
  be NSLPID dependent. but exactly what the values should be
  is a question for John's draft - or something like it ;-)

cheers,

robert h.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xiaoming Fu [mailto:fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de] 
> Sent: 07 July 2005 14:19
> To: Hancock, Robert
> Cc: nsis-imp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Nsis-imp] Assigned numbers for version GIMPS -06
> 
> 
> Hi Robert,
> Thanks for the work. 2 small questions:
> 
> - Is PI assigned with a TLV type? Otherweise currently there is no 
> fixed size & format for it (as part of NLI).
> - GIMPS RAO as *0* for Query?
> 
> Cheers,
> Xiaoming
> 
> 
> Hancock, Robert wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > we have made a page of assigned numbers for the various 
> bits of GIMPS 
> > at http://nsis.srmr.co.uk/nsis/assigned-numbers_06.html. 
> > 
> > these could be useful for implementors aiming at 
> interoperability :-)
> > 
> > Robert H.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSIS-imp mailing list
> > NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp
> 

_______________________________________________
NSIS-imp mailing list
NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp