[Nsis-imp] Further testing proposals

"Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk> Fri, 29 July 2005 09:48 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DyRTV-0007NZ-Tx; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:48:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DyRTT-0007Lo-Qx for nsis-imp@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:48:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA24674 for <nsis-imp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:48:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rsys001x.roke.co.uk ([193.118.201.108]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRz7-0002wI-DD for nsis-imp@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:20:58 -0400
Received: from rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk ([193.118.193.85]) by rsys001x.roke.co.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6T9llFt024866 for <nsis-imp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:47:47 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Received: from ac78840 (orion.roke.co.uk [193.118.192.66]) by rsys002a.roke.co.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id PJSG14XP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:50:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:47:41 +0100
Message-ID: <002001c59422$90cb2b00$0501a8c0@comm.ad.roke.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: Further testing proposals
Thread-Index: AcWUIvBMuLUwWjY5QmSwkwwXbXz+WA==
From: "Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk>
To: <nsis-imp@ietf.org>
X-MailScanner-rsys001x: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: robert.hancock@roke.co.uk
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 36b1f8810cb91289d885dc8ab4fc8172
Cc:
Subject: [Nsis-imp] Further testing proposals
X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols <nsis-imp.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nsis-imp>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1045732482=="
Sender: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi,

Here is a list of the 'non-basic' tests discussed Friday AM
(following the so-far successful basic D/C-mode testing).

1. Testing where initiator and/or responder is not the
end system (i.e. packet interception, different signalling
and flow addresses)
1a. Node chaining (needs three testing groups at once)

2. Non-trivial field combinations within a single MRI

3a. Testing multiple flows in parallel (D mode)
3b. Same again in C-mode, with connection re-use
3c. State refresh for a single flow with connection re-use
3d. As above, where the different flows 'overlap'
(e.g. same MRI but different SID or NSLP, or vice versa)

4. Cases for delayed responder state installation
(state setup only on Confirm)

5a. Multi-profile negotiation (even if only TCP is supported)
5b. Testing with unknown stack-configuration data fields,
including non-2-byte configuration data fields
5c. TLS usage

6a. Routing state expiration (correctness of timer management)
6b. Messaging assocation expiry (correctness of timer negotiation
and management)

7. Robustness testing (lost handshake messages)

Let's see how far we get by Saturday ;-)

r.
_______________________________________________
NSIS-imp mailing list
NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp