Re: [Nsis-imp] Assigned numbers for version GIMPS -06

Xiaoming Fu <fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de> Thu, 07 July 2005 16:05 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqYsD-0003vH-4L; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:05:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqYsB-0003ua-KM for nsis-imp@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:05:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA21177 for <nsis-imp@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:05:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from s2.ifi.informatik.uni-goettingen.de ([134.76.81.12]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqZJN-0002ox-TY for nsis-imp@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:33:19 -0400
Received: from [172.22.0.26] (tmg26.tmg.loc [::ffff:172.22.0.26]) (AUTH: LOGIN fu) by s2.ifi.informatik.uni-goettingen.de with esmtp; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:05:05 +0200 id 0002825E.42CD52B1.0000128C
Message-ID: <42CD5215.9020004@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:02:29 +0200
From: Xiaoming Fu <fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Nsis-imp] Assigned numbers for version GIMPS -06
References: <3F2E01E1D7B04F4EBEC92D3FA324D8807DD420@rsys004a>
In-Reply-To: <3F2E01E1D7B04F4EBEC92D3FA324D8807DD420@rsys004a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d8ae4fd88fcaf47c1a71c804d04f413d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nsis-imp@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols <nsis-imp.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nsis-imp>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi Robert,

Hancock, Robert wrote:
> hi,
> 
> the PI is only ever carried inside the NLI TLV, which includes
> size information for it. i'm not clear if there is any need to
> define a special TLV for it or a particular syntax (it is only
> ever compared by exact matching).
My point was, to rely on NLI TLV to determine the size of PI (by 
minus other fields) may be simple but not efficient for processing.

> i'm not sure what your question about the RAO value is. 
> - the RAO is present in any query-encapsulated datagram
>   message (including all Queries, and Data messages forwarded
>   by stateless nodes)
I thought stateless mode is not part of the current spec (?).

> - the RAO value of 0 is not realistic and in principle would
>   be NSLPID dependent. but exactly what the values should be
>   is a question for John's draft - or something like it ;-)
That's what I also guessed but there was a question of being "0".
I like John's statement "An NSLPID must be associated with a unique 
RAO value." Assuming a preliminary one for basic testing would be 
needed, possibly using e.g., "diagnostics/ping/traceroute" function.

Cheers,
Xiaoming
> 
> cheers,
> 
> robert h.
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Xiaoming Fu [mailto:fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de] 
>>Sent: 07 July 2005 14:19
>>To: Hancock, Robert
>>Cc: nsis-imp@ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: [Nsis-imp] Assigned numbers for version GIMPS -06
>>
>>
>>Hi Robert,
>>Thanks for the work. 2 small questions:
>>
>>- Is PI assigned with a TLV type? Otherweise currently there is no 
>>fixed size & format for it (as part of NLI).
>>- GIMPS RAO as *0* for Query?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Xiaoming
>>
>>
>>Hancock, Robert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>we have made a page of assigned numbers for the various 
>>
>>bits of GIMPS 
>>
>>>at http://nsis.srmr.co.uk/nsis/assigned-numbers_06.html. 
>>>
>>>these could be useful for implementors aiming at 
>>
>>interoperability :-)
>>
>>>Robert H.
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>NSIS-imp mailing list
>>>NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp
>>

_______________________________________________
NSIS-imp mailing list
NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp