RE: [Nsis-imp] Small mistake in C.4.1 of GIMPS-05

"Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk> Thu, 14 April 2005 14:39 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA19736; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:39:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DM5ep-0002DZ-H1; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:49:28 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DM5UW-0005mw-BV; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:38:48 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DM5UV-0005ka-DR for nsis-imp@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:38:47 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA19661 for <nsis-imp@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:38:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rsys001x.roke.co.uk ([193.118.201.108]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DM5eP-0002Cv-OA for nsis-imp@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:49:03 -0400
Received: from rsys002a.roke.co.uk (rsys002a.roke.co.uk [193.118.192.251]) by rsys001x.roke.co.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3EEcIQc002179; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:38:18 +0100
Received: by rsys002a.roke.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <26RQ8K50>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:38:37 +0100
Message-ID: <3F2E01E1D7B04F4EBEC92D3FA324D8807DD2B2@rsys004a>
From: "Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk>
To: "'Christian Dickmann'" <mail@christian-dickmann.de>, nsis-imp@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Nsis-imp] Small mistake in C.4.1 of GIMPS-05
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:38:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MailScanner-rsys001x: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: robert.hancock@roke.co.uk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols <nsis-imp.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nsis-imp>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nsis-imp-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465

Hi Christian,

You can report it here (which I read) or send it direct to the editors
(of which I am one).

(And you are right that it is an error!)

You can also check out the GIMPS issue tracker at 
http://nsis.srmr.co.uk/cgi-bin/roundup.cgi/nsis-ntlp-issues/index
(where you will find issue 35 contains a whole stream of issues
we found about this object format during the first informal set of
interoperability tests ...)

Thanks and keep reading ;-)

Robert H.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Dickmann [mailto:mail@christian-dickmann.de] 
> Sent: 10 April 2005 01:04
> To: nsis-imp@ietf.org
> Subject: [Nsis-imp] Small mistake in C.4.1 of GIMPS-05
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think I found a small mistake in chapter C.4.1 of the GIMPS
> draft (version 05).
> 
> In version 5 the Source Port and Destination Port flags of MRI
> where renamed from S/D to A/B. The text however continues
> refering to S and D ("If only one of S, D is set, both ...").
> 
> I hope this mailing list is the right place to report
> this issue.
> 
> Christian Dickmann
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSIS-imp mailing list
> NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp
> 

_______________________________________________
NSIS-imp mailing list
NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp