Re: [Nsis-imp] Assigned numbers for version GIMPS -06

Xiaoming Fu <fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de> Thu, 07 July 2005 16:49 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqZZC-0006ss-AF; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:49:38 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqZZB-0006ro-EY for nsis-imp@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:49:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA24908 for <nsis-imp@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:49:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from s2.ifi.informatik.uni-goettingen.de ([134.76.81.12]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dqa0P-00086z-Bu for nsis-imp@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:17:45 -0400
Received: from [172.22.0.26] (tmg26.tmg.loc [::ffff:172.22.0.26]) (AUTH: LOGIN fu) by s2.ifi.informatik.uni-goettingen.de with esmtp; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:49:35 +0200 id 0002825E.42CD5D1F.00002EB2
Message-ID: <42CD5C83.7000708@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:46:59 +0200
From: Xiaoming Fu <fu@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Nsis-imp] Assigned numbers for version GIMPS -06
References: <3F2E01E1D7B04F4EBEC92D3FA324D8807DD427@rsys004a>
In-Reply-To: <3F2E01E1D7B04F4EBEC92D3FA324D8807DD427@rsys004a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nsis-imp@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols <nsis-imp.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nsis-imp>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hancock, Robert wrote:
>>My point was, to rely on NLI TLV to determine the size of PI (by 
>>minus other fields) may be simple but not efficient for processing.
> 
> from C.4.3 (the NLI format):
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    |   PI-Length   |    IP-TTL     |IP-Ver |        Reserved       |
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>    PI-Length = the byte length of the Peer-Identity field
>                (note that the Peer-Identity field itself is padded
>                to a whole number of words)
> 
> i'm not sure what encoding the PI as a separate object would buy you
> here.
Sorry, I have missed this field.

> but see for example the end of the second paragraph of 3.1,
> "If the routing state does not exist, it may be possible for GIMPS to
> send a message anyway, with the same encapsulation as used for a
> Query message."

Well, a GIMPS engine will always do whatever it is supposed to, as 
long as the task is part of the 'spec' and the implementation.

>>>- the RAO value of 0 is not realistic and in principle would
>>>  be NSLPID dependent. but exactly what the values should be
>>>  is a question for John's draft - or something like it ;-)
>>
>>That's what I also guessed but there was a question of being "0".
>>I like John's statement "An NSLPID must be associated with a unique 
>>RAO value." Assuming a preliminary one for basic testing would be 
>>needed, possibly using e.g., "diagnostics/ping/traceroute" function.
> 
> 
> yep - you'll find the same statement about NSLPIDs in the GIMPS draft,
> btw. but the point is, we can't allocate a 'real' ourselves (without
> going to IANA), so we just picked an easy one. Some IP stacks seem
> to have a problem with values other than 0, in our experience.
> 
Good to know of this. Any example platform?
Xiaoming

_______________________________________________
NSIS-imp mailing list
NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp