Re: [NSIS] partly-decoupled signalling work

Hi all,

the working group expressed a lot of interest at last IETF meeting to 
move this work forward within the NSIS working group.

Is this a call for a hum again?
Is the question whether this document is a good starting point for the 
work on the partly-decoupled signaling work?
Is rechartering necessary before a document can be taken as a WG item?

Ciao
Hannes

john.loughney@nokia.com wrote:
> As we have a number of drafts that people have been interested
> in adding to our charter, I think we need to have some discussion
> on this draft on the mailing list.  I'd like to get some consensus
> if people feel this is a good way to go forward.
> 
> Some actual discussion & work on the draft - via mailing list
> discussions - would be a good thing as well.
> 
> John 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ext Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS [mailto:gash@att.com] 
>>Sent: 13 June, 2006 17:06
>>To: Robert Hancock; nsis@ietf.org
>>Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
>>Subject: RE: [NSIS] partly-decoupled signalling work
>>
>>
>>>many of you will be aware of a draft on an approach to 
>>
>>path-decoupled 
>>
>>>signalling (see the last version at:
>>>http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nsis/draft-hancock-nsis-pds-problem-03.txt).
>>>
>>>there was a presentation on this at the last IETF in Dallas (see 
>>>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/slides/nsis-1.ppt 
>>
>>followed by a 
>>
>>>productive discussion at the microphone (summary at 
>>>http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nsis/minutes?item=minutes65.html).
>>>
>>>as we approach submission cutoff deadlines, we'd like to solicit 
>>>comments and discussion additional to that expressed at the meeting. 
>>>in particular, we'd like to understand if the WG thinks that the 
>>>document is in a suitable state to be adopted as a working group 
>>>draft.
>>
>>This had good support at IETF-65 to become a WG document, and 
>>I continue to support that.  BTW, a link to the slides is at 
>>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/slides/nsis-1/sld1.htm 
>>(link above doesn't seem to work).
>>
>>Jerry
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>nsis mailing list
>>nsis@ietf.org
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> nsis@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis