RE: [NSIS] partly-decoupled signalling work

Hi all,

No hum needed, but there are a number of items to add to the charter,
once GIST, QoS NSLP, NATFW NSLP, etc. get sent to the IESG.  I'm
hoping for some work to start before the document is added to our
charter.

A small rechartering may be needed.

John

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] 
>Sent: 14 June, 2006 11:08
>To: Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)
>Cc: gash@att.com; robert.hancock@roke.co.uk; nsis@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [NSIS] partly-decoupled signalling work
>
>Hi all,
>
>the working group expressed a lot of interest at last IETF 
>meeting to move this work forward within the NSIS working group.
>
>Is this a call for a hum again?
>Is the question whether this document is a good starting point 
>for the work on the partly-decoupled signaling work?
>Is rechartering necessary before a document can be taken as a WG item?
>
>Ciao
>Hannes
>
>john.loughney@nokia.com wrote:
>> As we have a number of drafts that people have been interested in 
>> adding to our charter, I think we need to have some 
>discussion on this 
>> draft on the mailing list.  I'd like to get some consensus if people 
>> feel this is a good way to go forward.
>> 
>> Some actual discussion & work on the draft - via mailing list 
>> discussions - would be a good thing as well.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> 
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: ext Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS [mailto:gash@att.com]
>>>Sent: 13 June, 2006 17:06
>>>To: Robert Hancock; nsis@ietf.org
>>>Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
>>>Subject: RE: [NSIS] partly-decoupled signalling work
>>>
>>>
>>>>many of you will be aware of a draft on an approach to
>>>
>>>path-decoupled
>>>
>>>>signalling (see the last version at:
>>>>http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nsis/draft-hancock-nsis-pds-problem
>-03.txt).
>>>>
>>>>there was a presentation on this at the last IETF in Dallas (see 
>>>>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/slides/nsis-1.ppt
>>>
>>>followed by a
>>>
>>>>productive discussion at the microphone (summary at 
>>>>http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nsis/minutes?item=minutes65.html).
>>>>
>>>>as we approach submission cutoff deadlines, we'd like to solicit 
>>>>comments and discussion additional to that expressed at the meeting.
>>>>in particular, we'd like to understand if the WG thinks that the 
>>>>document is in a suitable state to be adopted as a working group 
>>>>draft.
>>>
>>>This had good support at IETF-65 to become a WG document, and I 
>>>continue to support that.  BTW, a link to the slides is at 
>>>http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/slides/nsis-1/sld1.htm
>>>(link above doesn't seem to work).
>>>
>>>Jerry
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>nsis mailing list
>>>nsis@ietf.org
>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nsis mailing list
>> nsis@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>> 
>> 
>
>

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis