Re: [NSIS] NAT/Firewall NSLP LE-MRM/DTINFO concerns

Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de> Mon, 22 May 2006 14:05 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiB2e-0007Yb-HK; Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:52 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiB2c-0007YV-LI for nsis@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:50 -0400
Received: from kyoto.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiB2b-0001xR-7l for nsis@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 10:05:50 -0400
Received: from [10.1.1.109] (mito.netlab.nec.de [195.37.70.39]) by kyoto.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E00E1BAC4D; Mon, 22 May 2006 15:57:28 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <42260.24.199.92.165.1147370340.squirrel@mail.piranho.net>
References: <A632AD91CF90F24A87C42F6B96ADE5C57EBF28@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk> <37901.24.199.92.165.1147285957.squirrel@mail.piranho.net> <21A356F7-E84A-4131-AEE0-7872E21D4CAB@netlab.nec.de> <42260.24.199.92.165.1147370340.squirrel@mail.piranho.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
X-Priority: 3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <7CB9AE4B-E796-4D9B-B2E0-EC4E6B02F8FC@netlab.nec.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [NSIS] NAT/Firewall NSLP LE-MRM/DTINFO concerns
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:05:46 +0200
To: Henning Peters <hpeters@math.uni-goettingen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Cc: nsis <nsis@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nsis-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Henning,

Am 11.05.2006 um 19:59 schrieb Henning Peters:

> Hi Martin,
>
>> Does this imply C:NF(NAT) being NATFW NSLP unaware or do you say
>> C:NF(NAT) is NATFW NSLP aware but does not care about the message?
>>
>> The picture does not show the NATFW NSLP operation
>> if C:NF(NAT) is NATFW NSLP aware.
>
> C is a NATFW NSLP aware hop with the artificial restriction that it  
> does
> not add port information. By this negative conjecture I wanted to show
> that the port  indeed is necessary for upstream NAPTs, not only the  
> edge.
> My point was that LE-MRM does not only talk to the edge (as Robert  
> said
> previously), but also to all intermediate NAPTs.

I see us on the same side. The intermediate NAPTs need the port  
information
as well. However, Robert's comment on "need for talking to the edge" is
valid, since the host behind a NAT is basically interested in the  
external
IP address and port and does not care about what is happening in
between.

   Martin

>
> Henning
>
>>
>> Can you clarify this? Otherwise the answer to this email is going
>> full of ifs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>    Martin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> nsis@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis


_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis