IETF Logo Mail Archive

[NSIS] NATFW NSLP support for NAT-PT (IPv4 to IPv6 translation)

Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de> Thu, 11 May 2006 13:12 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeAyD-0003d4-IX; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:12:45 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeAyB-0003cz-QK for nsis@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:12:43 -0400
Received: from kyoto.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeAy9-0000YY-Gg for nsis@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:12:43 -0400
Received: from [10.1.1.109] (mito.netlab.nec.de [195.37.70.39]) by kyoto.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373421BAC4D for <nsis@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:05:39 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C095E458-0E69-4F52-8A37-A4866927B20D@netlab.nec.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
To: nsis <nsis@ietf.org>
From: Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:12:38 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Subject: [NSIS] NATFW NSLP support for NAT-PT (IPv4 to IPv6 translation)
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nsis-bounces@ietf.org

Dear all,

The draft -11 of the NATFW NSLP is somewhat unspecified about the  
usage of
the IPv4 to IPv6 (and vice versa) transition mechanism NAT Protocol  
Translation
(NAT-PT, RFC 2766). While in the past the NSLP had some text  
specifying how
the NSLP should handle NAT-PT, it has been removed. One of the  
reasons is
the draft http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt- 
to-exprmntl-03.txt

The question is where to go with NAT-PT. Should the NATFW NSLP support
NAT-PT or not? Probably, this is requires more a political answer  
rather than
a technical!

   Martin

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email