IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Thu, 27 August 2020 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893B03A11AA; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.036
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wTSgU2zy1pr4; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23C73A11CF; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56E940605C; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, odonoghue@isoc.org, draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds@ietf.org
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> of "Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:59:37 PDT." <20200827165937.GQ16914@kduck.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:08:05 -0700
Message-Id: <20200827180805.A56E940605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/-ONo6TuwcvmqrWXqlj4jJf6fZO0>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 18:08:21 -0000

kaduk@mit.edu said:
> General crypto best practice is to only use a given key for a single usage
> and with a single algorithm, so my expectation is that the algorithm would be
> assigned/negotiated at the same time that the key and key-ID are. 

Correct.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email