Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5EC120026; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:03:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id exqh2OrUla8E; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com (mail-lf1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EAD31200F8; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id 9so347183lfq.10; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:03:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EeIcVsv9RvKQCsxH1af8mPtdIn0YKlN+RrJd05SgIBQ=; b=QFKHXdU/K1BqB+lyNSVtkQ/Z4T2YA31cMclZAsyH+P8Scn134ewPGrcTQw0lEg1NWY DFTnIvdEcZFfN77Xk/6rEvhcvgU9y1XuhYICZq1Y1IHVuVBAThc+pXxlizaPVpGPM9Au QEEwX50JYLKTqgKPvkHn423XO631ZPAqoJarY+sBy6Tkwm0OBdeodhSIi0oKuTmuuGOg ttrS8zwqrXqdgW7emWy5FexsVd0b9e4DrWFZSA4hzGuPBL38/ctHT6RC7mXg6vBdNP5p yNvTyz1J1bFH2CXbhMxHNAaG4QNCaWh9WNnCpU0Nh62+iogOAWISJzSFNVF20T1O2cOk dtIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EeIcVsv9RvKQCsxH1af8mPtdIn0YKlN+RrJd05SgIBQ=; b=EhRlK9xILTNh1mteDS4k77pemmnkfFYevJifCl6HrqB6y2S1Pa0nhimaFDPZ2uNN+O 3M5H2WN/6sQ7mJ7ULmahLvtiVTJujt1xD1BlhCA7ydRG26CgvElrvsWKAgJOUlq55tU8 hlUm/RqLuX4k+SFpg7AJQVbMOdJIBPCnV7XsPotF36hZHNsV1XxTP/IcKCLC+gLkHht2 ov6ZyRou/KwWogdO+yYwI0C4u+Erk2yHrHJkq+cFexD0seqjer55/jCGhWJCGPiBiiL4 4BZAXSirIG4zwXfKftofx0kl/REy4MYapjg317Xjp7S1idR/oFOEAnvF5nAQZGvOEbGN A7rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWQQ/ZfxTPbRam/rVWn8LXG3H0kMJ/nnjecjIgzKigAYcaJEOWC gG6plEtsFjPtnA+KVwb72VBWrE+Au1zlTXEX6sPgIkwJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4qMukVc9lQ75FLM5mfAhtcNCf7MPE/ZeVrMqlXsTZllMMvoxsykLhtlvl+jG/LK6htH7d1ET91XAh/mW0BIQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5ec3:: with SMTP id d3mr13993385lfq.176.1582124595544; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:03:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158169157632.16127.5189378582509283109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20200219072347.GA2747553@ot.lublin.se> <C5A4EA54-73BA-4401-9086-C759AE161792@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <C5A4EA54-73BA-4401-9086-C759AE161792@nohats.ca>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:03:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0ckxFjpSFBYb-rrGsZWwnrRv0_4RFwBg0rwRS5Mno6t4_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Daniel Lublin <daniel@lublin.se>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, "Karen O'Donoghue" <odonoghue@isoc.org>, draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, suresh@kaloom.com, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/0HXnjLvX37fWehQsHzjt-69OJvQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:03:19 -0000

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:45 AM Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2020, at 02:23, Daniel Lublin <daniel@lublin..se> wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> I'm not entirely convinced of keeping a list of implementations in an RFC.
> But since the information is there, let's at least have it corrected and
> updated upon publishing.
>
>
> There shouldn’t be. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7942
>
> which clearly states:
>
>
>    Since this information is necessarily time dependent, it is
>    inappropriate for inclusion in a published RFC.  The authors should
>    include a note to the RFC Editor requesting that the [implementation] section be
>    removed before publication.

I could have sworn that note appears in the draft in Section 8, and
looking at the file it indeed does.

>
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp



-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.