Re: [Ntp] [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Tue, 19 September 2017 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8219A126E64; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXScps78yPdi; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B23132331; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DVS54142; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 01:23:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.50) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 02:23:51 +0100
Received: from DGGEML507-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.79]) by dggeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.50]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:23:42 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
CC: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang
Thread-Index: AQHTLMS9I02w6VlOokuuR++M6yrZg6K5t3wAgAG4GWA=
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 01:23:41 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBB5C1335@dggeml507-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <2D6594B3-2C10-4B65-B789-788A2DBF8E30@isoc.org> <CABUE3XnPpisKkWiW2qBCJiO6Xjrb-bzer+Q_Kv=TfCdAcqXLGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABUE3XnPpisKkWiW2qBCJiO6Xjrb-bzer+Q_Kv=TfCdAcqXLGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.202.215]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBB5C1335dggeml507mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.59C071A9.000C, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.79, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 18bd5f0f5521daee44e198e34c13a4cd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/2HLtOyczPyVHKnxzcBL9miGzVEw>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 01:23:57 -0000

Tal,

   Good suggestions! Based on your comments, I would propose the following texts for the Security considerations:
   “YANG modules are designed to be accessed via the NETCONF protocol
   [RFC6241], thus security considerations in [RFC6241] apply here.
   Security measures such as using the NETCONF over SSH [RFC6242] and
   restricting its use with access control [RFC6536] can further
   improve its security, avoid injection attacks and misuse of the
   protocol. Furthermore, general security considerations of time
   protocols are discussed in [RFC7384].

   Some data nodes defined in this YANG module are writable, and an
   inappropriate use of them may adversely impact a synchronization network,
   for example, loss of synchronization on a clock, accuracy degradation
   on a set of clocks, or even break down of a whole synchronization network.”

  Are you OK with the above texts?

Thanks a lot,
Yuanlong


From: ntp [mailto:ntp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tal Mizrahi
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 2:59 PM
To: Karen O'Donoghue
Cc: ntp@ietf.org; tictoc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang

Hi,

I believe this draft is almost ready to proceed to the IESG.

Other than the YANG format issues that have already mentioned on the list, I believe the Security Considerations section should be slightly extended.
- "Some data nodes defined in this YANG module are writable, and any changes to them may adversely impact a synchronization network."
  Please elaborate about the consequences, i.e., what is the impact on the network (Clock inaccuracy? Loss of synchronization? Other consequences?).
- The section should probably mention that the security considerations of time protocols in general are discussed in [RFC 7384].

Cheers,
Tal.


On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org<mailto:odonoghue@isoc.org>> wrote:
Folks,

This message begins a 2 week working group last call (WGLC) for the following document:

YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588v2
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang/

Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the mailing list including your assessment of whether this document is mature enough to proceed to the IESG. Please note that these messages of support for progression to the mailing list are important and will be used to determine WG consensus to proceed.

Please send all comments in by Thursday 28 September 2017.

Thank you!
Karen
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
TICTOC@ietf.org<mailto:TICTOC@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc