[Ntp] draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-05: GREASE-type tags?
JP Sugarbroad <taralx@gmail.com> Tue, 21 September 2021 04:09 UTC
Return-Path: <taralx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786583A1FC9 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8aFA6bUwWzXL for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CCE3A1FC6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id m21so10304089pgu.13 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e9in6Chxs90haY/w5+hWSywAzYa1TJsZ9iDmwm7bmng=; b=XCikN7eif40X9mrYiVGHbvVeX45d3LMPGC5vvvlZz6k1d/TdFFPhd20K8F3XNzPW8w ySt5h8L8W9VZIhW9rfYuDSv6iXlZelJj+v5MO0cW20/6TvPLq54HkVev7VE7pLdSOSFJ SRtgao/BvKEhFpwoWfX3cDe58CTGwXGUeXReKYnDOqiRC3sWnh4MXSXkMLOp3f2DQv5v mcOHOmjBfgeFxFnDjKLUs6mefDr4Njmrg7l6ZmjwjZKrZYhUmnw2PrKEhog9Z3vsEEbt 7HpAoYyIc3hllAItE5vdiOonaRUSH699DCx+PUzzawH6p+EqAdQ+xDPJdn8uuXlc3X/A Sjig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e9in6Chxs90haY/w5+hWSywAzYa1TJsZ9iDmwm7bmng=; b=m01YFzU+cmPtyXrOlOL2DWALwJTIpzKY/B+pHD8mpvG5PavcRKZxi3FU8Kc7/oF7/K noaUiWOGqrPmicW2+ds0x9gj7ijBGV+c8mANu323xbt+OtUG5sS0kdAk/fGFKiU8gSb2 0LKXYVTNso/mdRwYYtSWRTIBvTThQWVuYNJs+iSWtwdo4fVIZWHuyMeslFMjqQWfc9LO sKfpKarwbX+5MOeNQdWz/AFj8Ncb94etvv9e4VlQJLQlSvejQE0vH2OVu78XeAAGM0K3 l5FUC2zTQn0IJRlFNTBYkk51sSKmZHJs1KYrsDe/T/yzpEiAuKJqn7ucNVULB61MeUpj 2/cA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325dIynGyL8/8lMcfv2ODN0BtYDgWS0/ffYvGir9ebQACn+Qjak 8rBdritJtNfST3PA5E8sSSaIEpDwHUbdqks5oxkQOPg/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxP84o9l0hj2MTlQU064/k08FJeQ5vcdjVo2UIacNRarGRrGR7Lsx0Jug75C1KgZ3vtBJOxBNWQf7z8+UR/Ag=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2a2:b0:43d:ea13:9c06 with SMTP id q2-20020a056a0002a200b0043dea139c06mr28888111pfs.37.1632197380819; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: JP Sugarbroad <taralx@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:09:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGZkp1-hdbJyZ_v17mPt8PPm_WOMEu6+m1s1Z53USDZEEpsSYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000016509b05cc799194"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/3HDNDhXL2dFD5P7GPMcD2ZBy0_g>
Subject: [Ntp] draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-05: GREASE-type tags?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:09:44 -0000
I notice there is a requirement to ignore unknown tags. However, with the existence of a defined padding tag, I worry that implementations will not necessarily abide by this requirement, making future extensions difficult to deploy. Perhaps a GREASE-type tag space would be beneficial? -- JP Sugarbroad <taralx@gmail.com> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown
- [Ntp] draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-05: GREASE-type ta… JP Sugarbroad
- Re: [Ntp] draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-05: GREASE-typ… Watson Ladd