Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56EA120024 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:31:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id im36MLxzBifO for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:31:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C86C12001A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:31:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582104703; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lxbD2vn1F1TA0yZ2m9Rer2jP3r9tJG0UYDVgzsMZgj8=; b=BEiu57DvN1U0h3qOWXPDKFD7F9QaO/KhBgCXJTqiMhMr//xwZ4e7wf5rke2RIb/EfIU0Dm Jw7TDOgq2NHGBl2JcBt0S+xgoG1bbvosY35Bb0aU3JkWtcrbfEXYDV5WtA2kjtI8WOBnm+ +EBybUm/KTy5OGb2AOeNnJ/5C5hzMMc=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-234-bz4rvsblPby1HCuu_pf0cg-1; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 04:31:41 -0500
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B0118C35A2 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:31:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (holly.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com [10.43.134.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D46B5C28E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:31:39 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:31:38 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200219093138.GQ13103@localhost>
References: <daniel@lublin.se> <20200219072347.GA2747553@ot.lublin.se> <20200219084813.E4C6840605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200219084813.E4C6840605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-MC-Unique: bz4rvsblPby1HCuu_pf0cg-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/4K6F67jsSmJwwHKIjZyqACbZJRA>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:31:47 -0000

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:48:13AM -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
> I thought it was a temporary section and would be deleted by the final editing 
> pass when the TBDs were filled in.

That's my understanding too.

> Speaking of TBDs...  How do we contact the czar who assigns numbers for NTP 
> extensions?  We've all been testing with 4 values.  It will be a pain if they 
> change and I don't know of any reason not to make the values we are using 
> official.

Yes, that would help. However, the NTS-KE port is different between
the implementations, so there will still probably be a flag day.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar