IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Re: NTP speed of synchronization question

Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net> Sun, 25 August 2024 04:23 UTC

Return-Path: <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE07C14F70A for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sonic.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGXqrftME27S for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C32C14F6BE for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (107-137-68-135.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.137.68.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 47P4NirO016879 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:23:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sonic.net; s=net23; t=1724559825; bh=fKohsZeFojHecNeeP8Iz1anKhaz9I6dJ134pK57OrWI=; h=To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject; b=x/T29R39beUi8dlChrRO8/OLeCYdw+ToQL5vkdWNoQDJsPT3OknkRSWBw1YFtgGob nb5rfa+jT9Y4ioG06IXP4bmo3B1DQfZwKllWMvCFOjhcxbCkAQN41y7EI/ev+SZ6oG MRwXDz3QJ/UlgqiuSFU8OQbEnIyMo6NyTDMxnHhna7SGMXMdhwZJGkZYXm5yemG3rN r7gl0reKj/+ULug7u4vbOTtUcXIyF5LrM9PoEV+P4AZ28dDVbJayOZMd2Vx2yJNxsi VpZ3OuJGzyywpvKTCDW4uAaZFC8bu+eYP9X5NK/j6jRdEtSXb3NOhhcYdNvpigKw+V IUxhNGTDLeWuQ==
Received: from hgm (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDD862003D; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.8
To: ntp@ietf.org
From: Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Tony Li <li.tony@comcast.net> of "Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:42:19 -0700." <00A46BF8-7C2B-4EB0-B89D-BD231A7A1666@comcast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 21:23:44 -0700
Message-Id: <20240825042344.4BDD862003D@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbDVFqm30Wl2LSiF+82eAzdGbiGtEK2LZDMCpAVvKsenXYg4Ll+C0MO198jN0mgtGGFfQQrM5pKqAI04jWLQ3NnY3SCQB78I/Q=
X-Sonic-ID: C;krTh0Jli7xGnvc+N3bHVhw== M;9jz60Jli7xGnvc+N3bHVhw==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: -1.5/5.0 by cerberusd
Message-ID-Hash: IHUAR4MBSZ2DHNFXWJJHASEBKG475S53
X-Message-ID-Hash: IHUAR4MBSZ2DHNFXWJJHASEBKG475S53
X-MailFrom: halmurray+ietf@sonic.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ntp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Ntp] Re: NTP speed of synchronization question
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/4T8TbwoieHC1G2lVm5wnCvYkQGY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ntp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ntp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ntp-leave@ietf.org>

li.tony@comcast.net said:
> Most router vendors are not religious about tracking upstream. 

That may be a deliberate decision rather than a lack of religion.

An alternative religion is "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Changing anything requires a lot of testing.  A lot more if you are 
serious about reliability.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status