Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-01.txt (Was: WGLC on draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt)
"Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com> Tue, 30 June 2015 13:45 UTC
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312101A8AA5 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vWfrwHCfEW8f for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A261A87D7 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1459A86DADC for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:45:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF5286D48C for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:45:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [58.251.152.64] (helo=szxga01-in.huawei.com) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <anil.sn@huawei.com>) id 1Z9vqk-000Ghc-TG for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:45:30 +0000
Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CQJ54629; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:44:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.155]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:44:41 +0800
From: "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com>
To: Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-01.txt (Was: WGLC on draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt)
Thread-Index: AdCzNT97wwMopLF7SfaglIyzNlo4ZwABR5Bg
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:44:40 +0000
Message-ID: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06B5AEA54@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <a55c427404b444bf93d4f9bff62f513f@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
In-Reply-To: <a55c427404b444bf93d4f9bff62f513f@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.212.150]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 58.251.152.64
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: anil.sn@huawei.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-01.txt (Was: WGLC on draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
Hi All, Thanks Tal for considering the query. Yes, Even I would like to hear from WG. Please give your opinion on M-Bit. I hope, this is right time. I don't want to hold any drafts for adoption. Thanks & Regards Anil S N "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" - Jon Postel > -----Original Message----- > From: Tal Mizrahi [mailto:talmi@marvell.com] > Sent: 30 June 2015 18:46 > To: Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL); Karen O'Donoghue; > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; tictoc@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-01.txt > (Was: WGLC on draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt) > > Hi Anil, > > Thanks for the prompt response. > > > I support this draft, But how about more Bit incorporating in field > type, Tal let me know your view. > > The checksum trailer draft requests IANA to allocate an extension field > type. > Note that: > (1) In unauthenticated mode, the checksum trailer extension field is > the last one. > (2) In authenticated mode, the checksum trailer extension field is > followed by the MAC / Autokey extension field. > > The suggested M-bit in draft-choudharykumar-ntp-ntpv4-extended- > extensions indicates whether the current extension field is the last or > not. > So once the checksum trailer draft has an allocated extension field > type, its most significant bit will be fixed to either 0 or 1, but > cannot cover both case (1) and case (2) above. > > A possible way to resolve this is to have two types allocated in the > checksum trailer draft, one for case (1), and another for case (2). The > two types would be identical, except for the most significant bit. This > would allow future compatibility with the M-bit, if adopted. > > A question to the WG: do we want to provision for the potential > adoption of the M-bit? > > Thanks, > Tal. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ntpwg [mailto:ntpwg-bounces+talmi=marvell.com@lists.ntp.org] On > Behalf Of Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL) > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:34 PM > To: Karen O'Donoghue; ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > Cc: tictoc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [ntpwg] WGLC on draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt > > I support this draft, But how about more Bit incorporating in field > type, Tal let me know your view. > > Thanks & Regards > Anil S N > > "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" - > Jon Postel > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ntpwg [mailto:ntpwg-bounces+anil.sn=huawei.com@lists.ntp.org] > On > > Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue > > Sent: 30 June 2015 17:59 > > To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > > Cc: tictoc@ietf.org > > Subject: [ntpwg] WGLC on draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt > > > > Folks, > > > > This begins a two week working group last call (WGLC) on > > draft-mizrahi- ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt Using UDP Checksum > Trailers > > in the Network Time Protocol (NTP) > > > > This document has been proposed as an experimental RFC and has been > > available for quite some time. > > > > Please respond by 15 July 2015 to the mailing list with any comments > > or objections to the draft. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer > > > > Thanks! > > Karen > > _______________________________________________ > > ntpwg mailing list > > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg > _______________________________________________ > ntpwg mailing list > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Anil Kumar
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-ntp-check… Danny Mayer